Research Submissions

Serotonin and Neuropeptides in Blood From Episodic and Chronic Migraine and Cluster Headache Patients in Case-Control and Case-Crossover Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simona D. Frederiksen PhD

Corresponding Author

Simona D. Frederiksen PhD

Independent Researcher, Copenhagen, Denmark

Address all correspondence to S.D. Frederiksen, Independent Researcher, Copenhagen, Denmark, email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Bekker-Nielsen Dunbar MSc

Maria Bekker-Nielsen Dunbar MSc

Independent Researcher, Salisbury, England

Search for more papers by this author
Agneta H. Snoer MD

Agneta H. Snoer MD

Danish Headache Centre and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Marie Deen MD, PhD

Marie Deen MD, PhD

Danish Headache Centre and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Lars Edvinsson MD, PhD

Lars Edvinsson MD, PhD

Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Glostrup Research Institute, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark

Division of Experimental Vascular Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 April 2020
Citations: 29
Agneta H. Snoer and Marie Deen contributed equally to the work.
Conflict of Interest: AHS is a sub-investigator in 3 clinical trials for Eli Lilly and LE is past President of the International Headache Society, Associate Editor for the Journal of Headache and Pain, and Amgen, Novartis and TEVA have provided support for talks given about CGRP. The other authors declare no conflict.
Funding: AHS was funded by TrygFonden, Denmark. SDF, MBND, MD and LE did not receive any funding related to this study.
Systematic review registration: Registered in PROSPERO on 3 July 2018 (study protocol id: CRD42018102488).

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SR-MA) was to identify signaling molecule profiles and blood-derived biomarkers in migraine and cluster headache (CH) patients.

Background

Currently no migraine and CH valid biomarkers are available. Blood tests based on biomarker profiles have been used to gather information about the nervous system. Such tests have not yet been established within the primary headache field.

Methods

Case-control and case-crossover studies investigating whole blood, plasma, and serum were identified worldwide. The qualitative synthesis focused on 9 signaling molecules (serotonin [5-HT], calcitonin gene-related peptide [CGRP], endothelin-1 [ET-1], neurokinin A, neurokinin B, neuropeptide Y, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide 38 [PACAP-38], substance P (SP), and vasoactive intestinal peptide) and the quantitative synthesis on 5-HT and CGRP (≥5 comparisons available). The meta-analysis was conducted using standard and 3-level random effect models.

Results

Fifty-four eligible studies were identified (87.0% migraine, 9.3% CH, 3.7% migraine, and CH), and 2768 headache patients and 1165 controls included. Comparable fluctuations of 5-HT, CGRP, ET-1, PACAP-38, and SP in blood were generally observed between migraine and CH. Significant findings were observed for some subgroups and strata, for example, higher interictal and ictal 5-HT venous blood levels (ratio of means = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.08; 1.61; ratio of means = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01; 1.49) in episodic migraine with aura with a female-dominated case group, higher interictal CGRP blood levels in episodic migraine (ratio of means = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.18; 2.26), and chronic migraine (ratio of means = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.33; 2.68), and higher ictal CGRP blood levels (ratio of means = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.09; 1.68) in episodic migraine were observed. In most subgroups, the quantitative synthesis revealed a high degree of heterogeneity between studies in part explained by the blood sampling site, specimen source, blood specimen, and sex distribution. Other potential confounders were age, aura, study quality, menstrual cycle, and methodology (eg, storage temperature).

Conclusions

Potential migraine and CH signaling molecule profiles and biomarkers were revealed. Nevertheless, the high degree of heterogeneity between studies impedes identification of valid biomarkers but allowed us to assess the presence of confounders. Consideration of the potential confounders identified in this SR-MA might be of importance in the experimental planning of future studies. This consideration could be incorporated through establishment of specific guidelines.